Addresses risks from AI systems that generate or amplify false, misleading, or deceptive information. This includes both inadvertent hallucinations that lead to inaccurate beliefs, and systemic pollution of the information ecosystem through personalized filter bubbles that undermine shared reality.
Incident volume relative to governance coverage; each dot is one of 7 domains
AI image enhancement tools were used to alter real photographs of Iranian political prisoners, creating confusion between authentic documentation and AI-generated content, undermining human rights advocacy efforts.
Developers: Unknown AI Image Editing Technology Developers
Deployers: Eyal Yakoby, Iranian Embassy In South Africa, Donald Trump, White House, United States Department Of State
South Africa's Draft National AI Policy included at least six fabricated academic journal citations that appear to have been hallucinated by an AI tool used in the document's preparation.
Developers: Unknown Generative AI Developers, Unknown Large Language Model Developers
Deployers: Department Of Communications And Digital Technologies (south Africa), Government Of South Africa
Two attorneys were sanctioned by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals for submitting legal briefs containing over 24 fake case citations that appeared to be AI-generated hallucinations, resulting in $30,000 in fines and reimbursement of legal costs.
Developers: Unknown Large Language Model Developers, Unknown Generative AI Developers
Deployers: Van Irion, Russ Egli
Entity
Who or what caused the harm
Intent
Whether the harm was intentional or accidental
Timing
Whether the risk is pre- or post-deployment
Establishes an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state regulations hindering United States Artificial Intelligence (AI) dominance. Directs an evaluation to identify state laws that mandate ideological bias or alter truthful model outputs. Restricts state access to federal funding, such as the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment program, unless states comply with a proposed national policy framework designed to preempt conflicting state-level AI mandates.
Defines "companion chatbot" and requires operators to notify users when they interact with AI. Requires protocols to prevent the production of harmful content. Mandates annual reports on crisis notifications. Offers civil remedies for violations. Ensures suitability disclosures for minors.
Amends California's Business and Professions Code to require large online platforms to detect and disclose provenance data of AI-generated content, prohibit GenAI hosting platforms from distributing non-compliant systems, and require capture device manufacturers to embed latent disclosures by default, with civil penalties of $5,000 per violation.
Each metric scaled to 0–100% of its peak across all 24 subdomains, so you can compare relative standing across different scales.