These visualizations are experimental and still being refined. Designs and data presentation may change.
Does Governance Reduce Harm?
Testing whether more governance correlates with fewer or less severe incidents. Toggle the Y-axis between incident count and expert BAU severity to see different perspectives on whether governance is associated with harm reduction.
Key Takeaways
- 1.Governance score vs. incident count: r = 0.35 (weak). More-governed subdomains tend to have more incidents (governance follows harm).
- 2.Governance score vs. expert BAU severity: r = 0.21 (weak). Higher-severity subdomains tend to attract more governance.
- 3.4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation has the largest incident-to-governance ratio (394 incidents, score 203.0).
- 4.7.2 AI possessing dangerous capabilities has the highest governance-to-incident ratio (score 140.0, 0 incidents).
Governance score weights enacted and proposed documents. Expert severity is BAU weighted mean (1–5).