This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Laws, legal frameworks, and binding policy instruments governing AI development and use.
Also in Legal & Regulatory
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use shall ensure the nondiscrimination of AI outcomes, and shall promote appropriate and effective measures to safeguard fairness in AI use
Reasoning
Establishes formal policy requiring organizations and nations to ensure non-discrimination and fairness in AI outcomes.
1 Awareness and education
2.4.4 Training & AwarenessDevelopment and monitoring of AI systems
2.3.3 Monitoring & LoggingTechnology and fairness
3.2.2 Technical StandardsA comprehensive approach to fairness
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use should require the purposes of such implementation to be identified and ensure that such purposes are consistent with the overall ethical purposes of beneficence and non-maleficence, as well as the other principles of the Policy Framework for Responsible AI.
3.2.2 Technical StandardsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Overarching principles
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Work and automation
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Environmental impact
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Weaponised AI
3.1.3 International AgreementsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > The weaponisation of false or misleading information
1.2.1 Guardrails & FilteringOther (general)
General mitigation not specific to a single lifecycle stage
Developer
Entity that creates, trains, or modifies the AI system
Manage
Prioritising, responding to, and mitigating AI risks
