This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
User vetting, access restrictions, encryption, and infrastructure security for deployed systems.
Also in Operations & Security
"2.1 At present IP laws are insufficiently equipped to deal with the creation of works by autonomous AI. 2.2 Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems should take necessary steps to protect the rights in the resulting works. Where appropriate these steps should include asserting or obtaining copyrights, obtaining patents, when applicable, and seeking contractual provisions to allow for protection as trade secrets and/or to allocate the rights appropriately between the parties. "
Reasoning
Establishes formal organizational policies for protecting intellectual property rights in AI-generated works through copyrights, patents, and contracts.
Ethical Purpose and Societal Benefit
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use should require the purposes of such implementation to be identified and ensure that such purposes are consistent with the overall ethical purposes of beneficence and non-maleficence, as well as the other principles of the Policy Framework for Responsible AI.
3.2.2 Technical StandardsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Overarching principles
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Work and automation
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Environmental impact
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Weaponised AI
3.1.3 International AgreementsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > The weaponisation of false or misleading information
1.2.1 Guardrails & FilteringOther (outside lifecycle)
Outside the standard AI system lifecycle
Developer
Entity that creates, trains, or modifies the AI system
Manage
Prioritising, responding to, and mitigating AI risks
