This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Voluntary commitments requiring coordination between organizations but without state enforcement. Participants comply because coordination provides mutual benefit, or because defection would harm their own interests or reputation.
Also in Ecosystem
We should strengthen education and training on the safe and proper use of AI among government, enterprises, and public service units. We should step up the promotion of knowledge related to AI risks and their prevention and response measures in order to increase public awareness of AI safety in all respects. We should guide and support industry associations in the fields of cybersecurity and AI to enhance industry self-regulation, and formulate self-regulation conventions that exceed regulatory requirements and serve exemplary roles. We should guide and encourage AI technology R&D institutions and service providers to continue to improve their safety capacity. A mechanism for handling public complaints and reports on AI risks and hazards should be established, forming an effective social supervision atmosphere for AI safety
Reasoning
Multi-stakeholder mechanism spanning industry self-regulation conventions and cross-organizational social supervision for AI safety.
Technological measures to address risks
Responding to the above risks, AI developers, service providers, and system users should prevent risks by taking technological measures in the fields of training data, computing infrastructures, models and algorithms, product services, and application scenarios.
1 AI SystemTechnological measures to address risks > Addressing AI’s inherent safety risks
99 OtherTechnological measures to address risks > Addressing safety risks in AI applications
99 OtherComprehensive governance measures
2.1 Oversight & AccountabilityComprehensive governance measures > Implement a tiered and category-based management for AI application
We should classify and grade AI systems based on their features, functions, and application scenarios, and set up a testing and assessment system based on AI risk levels. We should bolster enduse management of AI, and impose requirements on the adoption of AI technologies by specific users and in specific scenarios, thereby preventing AI system abuse. We should register AI systems whose computing and reasoning capacities have reached a certain threshold or those are applied in specific industries and sectors, and demand that such systems possess the safety protection capacity throughout the life cycle including design, R&D, testing, deployment, utilization, and maintenance.
3.1.4 Compliance RequirementsComprehensive governance measures > Develop a traceability management system for AI services
We should use digital certificates to label the AI systems serving the public. We should formulate and introduce standards and regulations on AI output labeling, and clarify requirements for explicit and implicit labels throughout key stages including creation sources, transmission paths, and distribution channels, with a view to enable users to identify and judge information sources and credibility.
3.1.4 Compliance RequirementsAI Safety Governance Framework
National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of SAC (2024)
Artificial Intelligence (AI), a new area of human development, presents significant opportunities to the world while posing various risks and challenges. Upholding a people-centered approach and adhering to the principle of developing AI for good, this framework has been formulated to implement the Global AI Governance Initiative and promote consensus and coordinated efforts on AI safety governance among governments, international organizations, companies, research institutes, civil organizations, and individuals, aiming to effectively prevent and defuse AI safety risks.
Other (outside lifecycle)
Outside the standard AI system lifecycle
Governance Actor
Regulator, standards body, or oversight entity shaping AI policy
Govern
Policies, processes, and accountability structures for AI risk management
