This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Structured analysis to identify, characterize, and prioritize potential harms and risks.
Also in Risk & Assurance
For users in key sectors such as government departments, critical information infrastructure, and areas directly affecting public safety and people's health and safety, they should prudently assess the long-term and potential impacts of applying AI technology in the target application scenarios and conduct risk assessments and grading to avoid technology abuse.
Reasoning
Organizational practice conducting risk assessments and grading to identify long-term and potential harms for key sectors.
Technological measures to address risks
Responding to the above risks, AI developers, service providers, and system users should prevent risks by taking technological measures in the fields of training data, computing infrastructures, models and algorithms, product services, and application scenarios.
1 AI SystemTechnological measures to address risks > Addressing AI’s inherent safety risks
99 OtherTechnological measures to address risks > Addressing safety risks in AI applications
99 OtherComprehensive governance measures
2.1 Oversight & AccountabilityComprehensive governance measures > Implement a tiered and category-based management for AI application
We should classify and grade AI systems based on their features, functions, and application scenarios, and set up a testing and assessment system based on AI risk levels. We should bolster enduse management of AI, and impose requirements on the adoption of AI technologies by specific users and in specific scenarios, thereby preventing AI system abuse. We should register AI systems whose computing and reasoning capacities have reached a certain threshold or those are applied in specific industries and sectors, and demand that such systems possess the safety protection capacity throughout the life cycle including design, R&D, testing, deployment, utilization, and maintenance.
3.1.4 Compliance RequirementsComprehensive governance measures > Develop a traceability management system for AI services
We should use digital certificates to label the AI systems serving the public. We should formulate and introduce standards and regulations on AI output labeling, and clarify requirements for explicit and implicit labels throughout key stages including creation sources, transmission paths, and distribution channels, with a view to enable users to identify and judge information sources and credibility.
3.1.4 Compliance RequirementsAI Safety Governance Framework
National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of SAC (2024)
Artificial Intelligence (AI), a new area of human development, presents significant opportunities to the world while posing various risks and challenges. Upholding a people-centered approach and adhering to the principle of developing AI for good, this framework has been formulated to implement the Global AI Governance Initiative and promote consensus and coordinated efforts on AI safety governance among governments, international organizations, companies, research institutes, civil organizations, and individuals, aiming to effectively prevent and defuse AI safety risks.
Plan and Design
Designing the AI system, defining requirements, and planning development
Deployer
Entity that integrates and deploys the AI system for end users
Map
Identifying and documenting AI risks, contexts, and impacts
