This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Governance frameworks, formal policies, and strategic alignment mechanisms.
Also in Oversight & Accountability
Reasoning
Establishes formal policies governing third-party risks and intellectual property protection within organizational governance framework.
Categorize different types of GAI content with associated third-party rights (e.g., copyright, intellectual property, data privacy).
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentConduct joint educational activities and events in collaboration with third parties to promote best practices for managing GAI risks.
3.3.1 Industry CoordinationDevelop and validate approaches for measuring the success of content provenance management efforts with third parties (e.g., incidents detected and response times).
2.2.2 Testing & EvaluationDraft and maintain well-defined contracts and service level agreements (SLAs) that specify content ownership, usage rights, quality standards, security requirements, and content provenance expectations for GAI systems.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresImplement a use-cased based supplier risk assessment framework to evaluate and monitor third-party entities’ performance and adherence to content provenance standards and technologies to detect anomalies and unauthorized changes; services acquisition and value chain risk management; and legal compliance.
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentInclude clauses in contracts which allow an organization to evaluate third-party GAI processes and standards.
2.2.3 Auditing & ComplianceInventory all third-party entities with access to organizational content and establish approved GAI technology and service provider lists.
2.3.2 Access & Security ControlsMaintain records of changes to content made by third parties to promote content provenance, including sources, timestamps, metadata.
1.2.5 Provenance & WatermarkingUpdate and integrate due diligence processes for GAI acquisition and procurement vendor assessments to include intellectual property, data privacy, security, and other risks. For example, update processes to: Address solutions that may rely on embedded GAI technologies; Address ongoing monitoring, assessments, and alerting, dynamic risk assessments, and real-time reporting tools for monitoring third-party GAI risks; Consider policy adjustments across GAI modeling libraries, tools and APIs, fine-tuned models, and embedded tools; Assess GAI vendors, open-source or proprietary GAI tools, or GAI service providers against incident or vulnerability databases.
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentUpdate GAI acceptable use policies to address proprietary and open-source GAI technologies and data, and contractors, consultants, and other third-party personnel.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresLegal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresLegal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented. > Align GAI development and use with applicable laws and regulations, including those related to data privacy, copyright and intellectual property law.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices. > Establish transparency policies and processes for documenting the origin and history of training data and generated data for GAI applications to advance digital content transparency, while balancing the proprietary nature of training approaches.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices. > Establish policies to evaluate risk-relevant capabilities of GAI and robustness of safety measures, both prior to deployment and on an ongoing basis, through internal and external evaluations.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresProcesses, procedures, and practices are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on the organization’s risk tolerance.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresArtificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (NIST AI 600-1)
US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024)
This document is a cross-sectoral profile of and companion resource for the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) for Generative AI, 1 pursuant to President Biden’s Executive Order (EO) 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence.2 The AI RMF was released in January 2023, and is intended for voluntary use and to improve the ability of organizations to incorporate trustworthiness considerations into the design, development, use, and evaluation of AI products, services, and systems.
Other (outside lifecycle)
Outside the standard AI system lifecycle
Governance Actor
Regulator, standards body, or oversight entity shaping AI policy
Govern
Policies, processes, and accountability structures for AI risk management