This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Structured analysis to identify, characterize, and prioritize potential harms and risks.
Also in Risk & Assurance
Reasoning
Examines and documents privacy risks identified through MAP function assessment—structured risk identification and characterization activity.
Conduct AI red-teaming to assess issues such as: Outputting of training data samples, and subsequent reverse engineering, model extraction, and membership inference risks; Revealing biometric, confidential, copyrighted, licensed, patented, personal, proprietary, sensitive, or trade-marked information; Tracking or revealing location information of users or members of training datasets.
2.2.2 Testing & EvaluationEngage directly with end-users and other stakeholders to understand their expectations and concerns regarding content provenance. Use this feedback to guide the design of provenance data-tracking techniques.
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentVerify deduplication of GAI training data samples, particularly regarding synthetic data
1.1.1 Training DataLegal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresLegal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented. > Align GAI development and use with applicable laws and regulations, including those related to data privacy, copyright and intellectual property law.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices. > Establish transparency policies and processes for documenting the origin and history of training data and generated data for GAI applications to advance digital content transparency, while balancing the proprietary nature of training approaches.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresThe characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, procedures, and practices. > Establish policies to evaluate risk-relevant capabilities of GAI and robustness of safety measures, both prior to deployment and on an ongoing basis, through internal and external evaluations.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresProcesses, procedures, and practices are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on the organization’s risk tolerance.
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresArtificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (NIST AI 600-1)
US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024)
This document is a cross-sectoral profile of and companion resource for the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) for Generative AI, 1 pursuant to President Biden’s Executive Order (EO) 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence.2 The AI RMF was released in January 2023, and is intended for voluntary use and to improve the ability of organizations to incorporate trustworthiness considerations into the design, development, use, and evaluation of AI products, services, and systems.
Verify and Validate
Testing, evaluating, auditing, and red-teaming the AI system
Developer
Entity that creates, trains, or modifies the AI system
Measure
Quantifying, testing, and monitoring identified AI risks
