These visualizations are experimental and still being refined. Designs and data presentation may change.
Framework Coverage Heatmap
How do the top 13 source frameworks distribute their mitigations across 5 mitigation categories? Click any cell to drill into subcategory breakdowns and individual mitigations.
Show other
Showing top-level mitigation categories. Click cells for details, column headers for definitions, source names for document info.
Source
Total
43
21
110
29
203
47
27
47
48
170
34
8
20
23
87
13
20
46
4
83
41
1
20
17
80
13
5
18
14
51
9
7
13
9
42
6
6
9
7
28
16
2
5
3
26
13
0
3
3
20
8
2
2
4
16
4
2
2
6
15
3
1
2
4
10
Source: MIT AI Risk Repository
Key Takeaways
1.Emerging Processes for Frontier AI Safety is the most comprehensive source, covering 21 of 28 subcategories with 170 mitigations.
2.California SB 1047 is the most specialized, covering only 8 subcategories despite 10 total mitigations.
3.10 subcategories are covered by 70%+ of the top 13 sources — strong consensus areas.
4.4 subcategories are covered by 2 or fewer sources — potential blind spots needing attention.
