Require parties using generative AI for court documents to disclose its use and name the specific tool. Include examples like ChatGPT, Bing AI, or Google Bard. Ensure compliance with existing filing standards under 12 O.S. §2011.
Analysis summaries, actor details, and coverage mappings were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
This is a binding court rule issued by a municipal court with mandatory disclosure requirements and enforcement through existing legal compliance mechanisms.
This document has minimal coverage of AI risk domains, with only subdomain 7.4 (Lack of transparency or interpretability) receiving a coverage score above 1. The document primarily addresses transparency through disclosure requirements rather than comprehensive risk mitigation across multiple domains.
This document primarily governs the Public Administration sector, specifically the judicial system and court operations. It regulates how legal professionals and parties interact with the municipal criminal court system when using AI tools.
The document focuses exclusively on the deployment and use stage of AI systems, specifically addressing how generative AI tools are used by legal practitioners in preparing court documents. It does not cover development, training, or validation stages.
The document explicitly mentions generative AI tools with specific examples (ChatGPT, Bing AI, Google Bard) but does not define or distinguish between AI models, AI systems, or other technical categories. It focuses on practical application rather than technical specifications.
City of Tulsa Municipal Court
The document is titled 'The City of Tulsa Municipal Court Rules 2024' and establishes requirements for filings with the Municipal Criminal Court, indicating the court itself is the proposing authority.
Tulsa Municipal Criminal Court
The Municipal Criminal Court has enforcement authority through its power to construe filings and apply existing statutory requirements under 12 O.S. §2011.
Tulsa Municipal Criminal Court
The court monitors compliance through review of filed documents and certification requirements, ensuring parties disclose AI use as required.
The rule explicitly targets attorneys, pro se defendants, victims, and other parties who use generative AI tools in preparing court documents, making them AI users subject to disclosure requirements.
4 subdomains (1 Good, 3 Minimal)