Official name: Utah S.B. 180 (Law Enforcement Usage of Artificial Intelligence)
Require law enforcement agencies in Utah to establish policies on generative AI use, specify permissible technologies and tasks, and include AI disclaimers in reports. Mandate author certification of reviewed AI-generated content for accuracy, effective May 7, 2025.
Analysis summaries, actor details, and coverage mappings were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
This is a binding state statute enacted by the Utah Legislature with mandatory requirements for law enforcement agencies, including specific policy requirements and certification obligations, with enforcement through administrative disciplinary action.
The document has minimal coverage of approximately 3-4 subdomains, with focus on misinformation risks (3.1), lack of transparency (7.4), and lack of robustness (7.3). Coverage is concentrated on AI system reliability and information quality concerns in law enforcement contexts.
This document exclusively governs the Public Administration sector, specifically law enforcement agencies. It establishes mandatory policies for generative AI use within law enforcement operations, including report generation and record-keeping activities.
The document focuses primarily on the Deploy and Operate and Monitor stages of the AI lifecycle. It addresses deployment through policy requirements for which AI technologies may be used and for what tasks, and emphasizes operational monitoring through mandatory review, certification, and disclaimer requirements for AI-generated content.
The document explicitly defines and focuses on 'generative artificial intelligence' as a specific type of AI technology capable of creating content. It also provides a broader definition of 'artificial intelligence' but does not mention frontier AI, general purpose AI, foundation models, compute thresholds, or open-weight models.
Legislature of the state of Utah
The document explicitly states it was enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah, which is the state legislative body that proposed and passed this law.
head of the law enforcement agency
The statute designates the head of each law enforcement agency as the enforcement authority who may impose administrative disciplinary action for policy violations.
head of the law enforcement agency
While not explicitly stated as a monitoring role, the head of the law enforcement agency implicitly monitors compliance through their enforcement authority and oversight of policy implementation. The certification requirement also creates a monitoring mechanism through author attestation.
law enforcement agencies in Utah; employees of law enforcement agencies
The statute explicitly applies to law enforcement agencies and their employees who use generative AI in the course and scope of their work. Law enforcement agencies are deployers of AI technology in this context.
4 subdomains (4 Minimal)
