This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Internal policies, content safety guidelines, and ethical design principles governing system creation.
Also in Engineering & Development
4.1 Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems should design, develop and deploy AI systems in a “compliance by design” manner which ensures consistency with the overarching ethos of subsisting competition/antitrust regimes to promote free and vibrant competition amongst corporate enterprises to the ultimate benefit of consumers.
Reasoning
Establishes "compliance by design" principle governing AI system development to align with antitrust/competition law requirements.
Ethical Purpose and Societal Benefit
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use should require the purposes of such implementation to be identified and ensure that such purposes are consistent with the overall ethical purposes of beneficence and non-maleficence, as well as the other principles of the Policy Framework for Responsible AI.
3.2.2 Technical StandardsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Overarching principles
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Work and automation
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Environmental impact
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Weaponised AI
3.1.3 International AgreementsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > The weaponisation of false or misleading information
1.2.1 Guardrails & FilteringOther (multiple stages)
Applies across multiple lifecycle stages
Developer
Entity that creates, trains, or modifies the AI system
Manage
Prioritising, responding to, and mitigating AI risks
