This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Laws, legal frameworks, and binding policy instruments governing AI development and use.
Also in Legal & Regulatory
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use shall endeavour to ensure that AI systems are compliant with privacy norms and regulations, taking into account the unique characteristics of AI systems, and the evolution of standards on privacy.
Reasoning
Establish formal privacy policies ensuring AI systems comply with privacy regulations and norms.
Finding a balance
3.1.1 Legislation & PolicyThe operational challenges ahead for AI users
2.1.2 Roles & AccountabilityAI as a tool to support privacy
99 OtherEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use should require the purposes of such implementation to be identified and ensure that such purposes are consistent with the overall ethical purposes of beneficence and non-maleficence, as well as the other principles of the Policy Framework for Responsible AI.
3.2.2 Technical StandardsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Overarching principles
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Work and automation
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Environmental impact
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Weaponised AI
3.1.3 International AgreementsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > The weaponisation of false or misleading information
1.2.1 Guardrails & FilteringOther (outside lifecycle)
Outside the standard AI system lifecycle
Developer
Entity that creates, trains, or modifies the AI system
Manage
Prioritising, responding to, and mitigating AI risks
