This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Cannot be confidently classified due to insufficient information, excessive vagueness, or ambiguity.
3.1 Although there are challenges from a privacy perspective from the use of AI, in turn the advent of AI technologies could also be used to help organisations comply with privacy obligations.
Reasoning
Too vague to identify specific mechanism. General aspirational statement without concrete implementation details.
Ethical Purpose and Societal Benefit
Organisations that develop, deploy or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use should require the purposes of such implementation to be identified and ensure that such purposes are consistent with the overall ethical purposes of beneficence and non-maleficence, as well as the other principles of the Policy Framework for Responsible AI.
3.2.2 Technical StandardsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Overarching principles
2.1.3 Policies & ProceduresEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Work and automation
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Environmental impact
2.2.1 Risk AssessmentEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > Weaponised AI
3.1.3 International AgreementsEthical Purpose and Societal Benefit > The weaponisation of false or misleading information
1.2.1 Guardrails & FilteringOther (outside lifecycle)
Outside the standard AI system lifecycle
User
Individual or organisation that directly uses the AI system
Manage
Prioritising, responding to, and mitigating AI risks
