This page is still being polished. If you have thoughts, please share them via the feedback form.
Data on this page is preliminary and may change. Please do not share or cite these figures publicly.
Runtime behavior observation, anomaly detection, and activity logging.
Also in Non-Model
quire continual learning based on new data collected during operation of the AI system. The continuous ethical validator deployed in an AI system continuously monitors and validates the outcomes of AI components (e.g., the path recommended by the navigation system) against the ethical requirements [58, 111]. The outcomes of AI systems are about whether the AI system provides the intended benefits and behaves appropriately given the situation. The time and frequency of validation can be configured. Version-based feedback and rebuild alert are sent when the pre-defined conditions regarding the ethical requirement are met.
AWS SageMaker Model Monitor107 continuously monitors the bias drift of the AI models in production. Qualdo108 is an AI monitoring solution that monitors data quality and model drift. Azure Machine Learning109 uses Azure Monitor to create monitoring data. Azure Monitor is a full-stack monitoring service.
Reasoning
Monitors AI system outcomes at runtime, detecting ethical violations and bias drift.
Governance Patterns
The governance for RAI systems can be defined as the structures and processes that are employed to ensure that the development and use of AI systems meet AI ethics principles. According to the structure of Shneiderman [104], governance can be built at three levels: industry level, organization level, and team level.
2.1 Oversight & AccountabilityGovernance Patterns > Industry-level governance patterns
3.1 Legal & RegulatoryGovernance Patterns > Organization-level governance patterns
2.1 Oversight & AccountabilityGovernance Patterns > Team-level governance patterns
2.1.2 Roles & AccountabilityProcess Patterns
The process patterns are reusable methods and best practices that can be used by the development team during the development process.
2.4.2 Design StandardsProcess Patterns > Requirement Engineering
2.4 Engineering & DevelopmentResponsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering
Lu, Qinghua; Zhu, Liming; Xu, Xiwei; Whittle, Jon; Zowghi, Didar; Jacquet, Aurelie (2024)
Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Recently, a number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much beyond truisms. In addition, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm level rather than system level, mainly focusing on a subset of mathematics-amenable ethical principles, such as fairness. Nevertheless, ethical issues can arise at any step of the development lifecycle, cutting across many AI and non-AI components of systems beyond AI algorithms and models. To operationalize RAI from a system perspective, in this article, we present an RAI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a multivocal literature review. Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle. The RAI Pattern Catalogue classifies the patterns into three groups: multi-level governance patterns, trustworthy process patterns, and RAI-by-design product patterns. These patterns provide systematic and actionable guidance for stakeholders to implement RAI. © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
Operate and Monitor
Running, maintaining, and monitoring the AI system post-deployment
Deployer
Entity that integrates and deploys the AI system for end users
Measure
Quantifying, testing, and monitoring identified AI risks
Other
