Harms from Estrangement
The development and operation of AI systems causing environmental harm, such as through energy consumption of data centers, or material and carbon footprints associated with AI hardware.
"Replacement by AI of human observation and interaction leads to neglect of certain interests"
Supporting Evidence (2)
"AI could gradually distance animal and farmer or other caretakers (Hemsworth & Coleman, 2010). That might sometimes be good for animals. But this estrange- ment might also forfeit opportunities for humans to notice individual animal needs (Werkheiser, 2018) and, moreover, to gain an intimate understanding of animals through experience and interaction, as many (say) farmers traditionally had."(p. 20)
"AI systems may be used in contract farming in a way that operates on the farmer (as worker) as much as the animal, by telling the farmer how and when to look after the animals within certain strict parameters set to achieve certain results, like Ama- zon warehouse workers (O’Neill et al., 2021). In time, this may undermine mutually beneficial relationships between humans and animals (Tuyttens et al., 2022)."(p. 20)
Part of Unintentional: indirect
Other risks from Coghlan & Parker (2023) (11)
Intentional: socially condemned/illegal
6.6 Environmental harmIntentional: socially condemned/illegal > AI intentionally designed and used to harm animals in ways that contradict social values or are illegal
6.6 Environmental harmIntentional: socially condemned/illegal > AI designed to benefit animals, humans, or ecosystems is intentionally abused to harm animals in ways that contradict social values or are illegal
6.6 Environmental harmIntentional: socially accepted/legal
6.6 Environmental harmUnintentional: direct
6.6 Environmental harmUnintentional: direct > AI is designed in a way that shows ignorant, reckless, or prejudiced lack of consideration for its impact on animals
6.6 Environmental harm